Talk:Scary Godmother: Halloween Spooktakular/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments later in the week. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 23:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! HumanxAnthro (talk) 01:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Using Amazon as a reference doesn't seem like a good choice per WP:AMAZON. I suggest replacing it with this.
  • As the two references after "first book" are already in #Background_and_development, they're not necessary for the lead.
  • Everything else looks good.

Plot[edit]

  • "Katie, Bert and Daryl" → "Katie, Bert, and Daryl"
  • "Bert, Daryl and Katie" → "Bert, Daryl, and Katie"
  • "He declares himself the "leader" out of nowhere by winning a rock, paper, scissors game." → "He declares himself the "leader" after winning a rock, paper, scissors game."

Background and development[edit]

  • "US$350,000" → "$350,000"
  • "vice president Kim Dent Wilder" → "Mainframe vice president Kim Dent Wilder"
  • "a TV series" → "a television series"

Production[edit]

Workflow[edit]

  • In the last paragraph of this section, remove the last part of the quote "and generally bugged everyone several times a week with my yammering phone calls" as it seems unnecessary, and add an [and] in-between "designed sets, painted backgrounds".

Casting[edit]

  • This section looks good.

Animation[edit]

Visual style[edit]

  • This section also looks good.

Release[edit]

  • This reference in the article says the film went to Region 1 DVD on September 3, not September 8. Also, change this in the lead.
  • "Germany and Italy" → "Germany, and Italy"

Reception[edit]

Overview[edit]

GAN table[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Notes[edit]