Talk:Scenic World

Australia: New South Wales / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Scenic World is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Scenic Skyway (especially the electrostatic glass floor), Orphan Rocker, Sceniscender be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

Is the revolving restaurant at Scenic World still there? The last time I visited, over a year ago, it looked to me like the whole building had been rebuilt from the ground up, and I couldn't see any revolving restaurant. --Centauri 23:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still there according to the official website. Maybe it's a new one.--Shantavira 10:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steepest railway?[edit]

Considering that the railway is used only for tourist pleasure, and that there are roller coasters that are almost or fully vertical, one could questionise this title. Compare Notable roller coasters. --BIL 12:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

except they wouldnt be considered railways...im not a railfan but i think it has something to do with being propelled in both directions, or some other technicality that qualifies it. also, the original railway was for mining and ran a track in the same spot and from memory the same incline. Trottsky 20:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC) This railway is the best —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.73.48.48 (talk) 05:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at Gelmerbahn in Switzerland with 106 %. --AHert (talk) 16:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Katoomba is 122% Dave Rave (talk) 00:22, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stoos is 110% which is not 122%, I've messaged stoos.cn and the BBC, geez, criminy Dave Rave (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Funicular or rail incline ?[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Railway_inclines
The funicular page mentions contra flow cars doing the work, but also cable drum wind. --Dave Rave (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]