Talk:Schoenstatt Apostolic Movement

Comment

This does not sound as NPOV to me: "Among other things, it seeks to invite the Blessed Mother (and, hence, her divine Son, Jesus Christ), into the home by establishing a Covenant of Love with her." -- 07:33, 23 April 2006 84.220.60.155

It seems to be a paraphrase of some of the ideological goals of the movement; it could possibly be better phrased, but I don't see any particular NPOV issues... AnonMoos 13:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Name

I propose changing the name to "Apostolic Movement of Schoenstatt" which is the most official title. User32423534215 (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

References

Tone

I like the Schoenstatt but the edits today June 17 2009 b a few people read like a brochure and have no references. Please edit them back to make them encyclopedic. Else they will just have to be reverted because they do not make Schoenstatt look good and read like spam. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 17:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree, it sounds like a brochure, vague and promotional, also there is no mention of the Secular Institute called the Schoenstatt Sisters of Mary who are consecrated lay women, or the Schoenstatt Fathers who are the priest branch. --Elizdelphi (talk) 07:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I changed them back. History2007 (talk) 07:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Schoenstatt Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130310001459/http://www.microsofttranslator.com/BV.aspx?ref=IE8Activity&a=http%3A%2F%2Fpress.catholica.va%2Fnews_services%2Fbulletin%2Fnews%2F29687.php%3Findex%3D29687%26po_date%3D18.09.2012%26lang%3Den to http://www.microsofttranslator.com/BV.aspx?ref=IE8Activity&a=http%3A%2F%2Fpress.catholica.va%2Fnews_services%2Fbulletin%2Fnews%2F29687.php%3Findex%3D29687%26po_date%3D18.09.2012%26lang%3Den

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

With respect to external links, I suggest that only national level movement websites, and, preferably, only internationally focused websites are used. I recently removed 4 links to diocesan movements, because there could be hundreds of those. Also, schoenstatt.org isn't actually an official website of the movement, but a small group of independent people, but it's probably the best Schoenstatt website there is; so I decided to leave it. User32423534215 (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)