Talk:Scottish art/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

File:Cadell, The Vase of Water.jpg needs a US copyright tag
Aside from that one detail, I think this is meets GA criteria. For it to pass FA, it will probably need more development of the sculpture, decorative objects, textiles and other non-painting forms of art. This is a great overview - your work on Scotland is truly impressive. Thank you! - Lemurbaby (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed that one issue. Many thanks for a rapid review. Much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]