Talk:Scuttling of the French fleet at Toulon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Laborde[edit]

Who is Laborde, mentioned without introduction in "Political aspect"?

It needs restructuring, yes, as both he and Marquis are 'officially' introduced in the paragraph below. 86.160.63.63 (talk) 03:24, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Alister[reply]

Pre-Dreadnought[edit]

Which were the "two pre-dreadnought battleships of no value"? Drutt (talk) 10:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One was Condorcet, which had been demoted to a depot ship in the early 1930s. 86.160.63.63 (talk) 03:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Alister[reply]

The other one was the former Jean Bart, renamed Océan after demilitarisation and becoming a school hulk in 1936.90.9.154.189 (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scuttling of the French fleet in Toulon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scuttling of the French fleet in Toulon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jean de Vienne[edit]

"The cruiser Jean de Vienne, in drydock, was boarded by German troops, who disarmed the demolition charges, but the open sea valves flooded the ship. She sank, blocking the drydock." - how can a ship inside a dry dock (ie without water around) be sunk? 80.151.9.187 (talk)

La Galissonniere,Lion and Jean de Vienne were all in a drydock and you can see in La Galissonniere page the ship is sunk alongside Dunkerque as they shared drydock, Dunkerque page also have a image showing their location. Simply put how do ships get inside a drydock? a drydock is not always dry.

Copyeditor notes (refimprove)[edit]

I am here trying to straighten out the narrative on Military history of France in World War II, where I had thought that some of these sunken ships might have been conflated. I am still getting that straight in my own mind but have made some minor wording changes to sentences whose English was not really wrong but slightly strange to a native speaker. I do not feel that any of these were substantive enough to introduce an error of fact but if so I would appreciate being notified, since bad translations of French military history of the period continue to appear in my life, so if I am mistaken about something I would like to stop perpetuating that mistake. I feel that some of the IP addresses on the talk page sound quite knowledgeable on this topic, but that this narrative does not quite meet en wikipedia’s strict referencing standards. Somewhat shocking assertions, such as an admiral acting in good faith while being undercut by his own government, should be referenced. References and attribution should also be given for formulations such as “some have written...but others believe...” and definitely for any quoted text, as obviously accurate as it may seem to the writer. That said, I find the article informative and interesting in that it appears to represent modern a German narrative.

I do have a couple of style quibbles:

  • I am an agnostic as to whether Pétain’s title should be Maréchal or translated as Marshal. The latter has a somewhat Wild West overtone to a North American ear, but is widely used on the en wikipedia. It is also in fact, as far as I know, the closest English word. But if the former is used, it should be spelled correctly, i.e. that accent is important and, without it, the word is simply spelled wrong. And in any given article it should be one or the other but not both. I have not addressed this but somebody who does care should standardize
  • Similarly, on first reference full names and titles and wiki links should be given, but after that, for the sake of readability, the last name only, unless there are two subjects with the same last name or other special use cases. I will probably take care of the current instances of this issue on my second pass.

Thank you for your attention to these matters Elinruby (talk) 05:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

39 small ships[edit]

The article is potentially midleading on the nature of those ships They weren’t warship for sure and most of them were certainly motor launch .

I recommand to replace ship by boat 2A01:CB00:BF8:9800:7C87:F96B:2919:5490 (talk) 05:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scuttling of the French fleet at Toulon's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ubootefr":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT 16:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]