Talk:Sea of Japan naming dispute/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
An 18th century name
Just a small point: The 'Arguments from Japan' section states that the international name of the sea changed from no name to the Sea of Japan... during the 17th to 20th centuries.
I don't know about 'no name'; the map in part III of Swift's Gulliver's Travels from 1726 (admittedly a fiction, but it must have been based on something) clearly labels it the 'Sea of Corea'. Make of that what you will... Moonraker12 (talk) 02:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
IHO and naming
This revert caught my eye.I did some googling, and found this, about the IHO Inter-Regional Coordination Committee (IRCC) on the IHO website. The first paragraph there says: "The Inter-Regional Coordination Committee (Programme 3 of the IHO Work Programme) supervises [...] and governing undersea feature names. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Wtmitchell: The second link you provided was regarding a specific committee within IHO, not IHO as a whole. It would make sense to split up the work among several groups. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- I do not disagree. I am not editing the article at this point -- just commenting here in passing and supplying info which may be useful to those engaged in editing the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)