Talk:Second Battle of Champagne

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

CE[edit]

German Strategy and the Path to Verdun: Erich von Falkenhayn and the Development of Attrition, 1870-1916 R Foley. I made an amendment to the conclusion using this source (Chapter seven) but I don't know how to cite it in the text.Keith-264 (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

X6 p. 201, 321Keith-264 (talk) 09:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis[edit]

@Keith-264. This article contains an "Analysis" part which doesn't have any citation. Can you add citation to it, please? Regards.Ti2008 (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Ti2008, it's far from a complete article and not all of it is my work but I think that paragraph comes from Foley.Keith-264 (talk) 14:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

does not mention Petain[edit]

Apparently he may have contributed to the lessons learned document. See "His talents became most apparent when his Second Army played a large role in the September 1915 offensive in Champagne. Though the French failed to break through German defensive lines, Pétain’s after-action report identified shortcomings in French methods and provided important ideas about future operations." ^[1] Unable to fix this at the moment, as this is three degrees of separation from the article I am working on, but thought I would mention it as room for improvment, given his subsequent importance.Elinruby (talk) 05:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reference[edit]

^ https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/henri-philippe-petain

[1] ttps://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/henri-philippe-petain

[1]