Talk:Secondary stability

On 7 May 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Secondary Stability to Secondary stability. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 7 May 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 13:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary Stability → Secondary stability – correct grammar Sauer202 (talk) 12:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment those are the same—blindlynx (talk) 16:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't appear to be a proper noun so if nothing else move to Secondary stability. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops, typed the error myself. Made the correction in the proposal above. The proposal should read: Secondary Stability → Secondary stability. Sauer202 (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that this needs to be discussed if we're just fixing the grammar, it can just be boldly moved. I assumed you were wanting to move it to a different name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was unable to make the move myself since the target page already existed. In retrospect perhaps I should have mentioned this. Sauer202 (talk) 18:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think this needs a discussion about Secondary stability too, which is currently a redirect to a section at Kayak. Also whether this could be covered in a more appropriate place (the concept clearly is not unique to kayaks...), because as it stands a standalone article is a WP:NOTDICT issue, too... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it would seem reasonable that this form of stability should be applicable to boats in general (or perhaps even bodies in water in general, or bodies in general ..?) Sauer202 (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
support per MOS:CAPS —blindlynx (talk) 22:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – obvious application of MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 02:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator. This is so obvious it could just have been speedy moved. JIP | Talk 13:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Not a proper name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.