Talk:Self-bondage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About the checklist of methods for 'safe' self-bondage':
the final, fat mark, doesn't seem to fit in the list. To me, that is.

First, it's not a precautionary measure, but a warning.
Second, its very tone is not fitting for an encyclopedia.

So if the author could, please rewrite that part... Thank you.




Can you feel the tension in the air, its you pulling at my pubic hair...



User: Zesty Prospect

Note from non-user: The idea that bondage is inherently sexual is extremely norrowly minded. Bondage is generally sensual, and often intimate, even when alone, but it doesn't have to be, and even if it is, it still need not be sexual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.66.246.225 (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Sorry, I'm not very familiar with the editing side of Wikipedia, I just noticed an error that I find harmful in certain aspects.[reply]

Removed "Advice" section[edit]

While I am definitely an inclusionist when it comes to Wikipedia, I feel I have to remove the section regarding common advice and precautions in this article. I assure everyone that I have nothing against self bondage, I love Wikipedia, and this is definitely not formatted in an encyclopedic manner. Please see "Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal", as described in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. I hope this content may be re-incorporated, maybe in a "safety" section, but as it stands, the content is not article-like, and is unsourced.