Talk:Sensitive skin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request. Though seemingly rather vanilla, this is a superlative example for highlighting various aspects of naming conventions to be considered on a move all wrapped up in one title. Over its predecessor: it's more natural and recognizable because it's far more common; is adequately precise and is more concise without introducing ambiguity; and is the primary topic.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


– "Sensitive skin" is a subtopic of Skin, which of course is the clear primary topic of the word, "skin". Therefore, the title of the article on skin that is sensitive should reflect this primacy. Also, a Google search yields overwhelming primacy for the human skin topic, and a Google Books search returns only results for the human skin topic. bd2412 T 20:45, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support of course, this seems really obvious. Red Slash 23:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. new title adds clarity--LT910001 (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.