Talk:Seoul Lite

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Non-free images in this article[edit]

Its ridiculous. WP:NFCC requires minimal usage. There are way too many non-free images in this article. Even with a rationale they are still non-compliant, since there are way too many non-free files that are unneeded within this article. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The infobox image and at the very most one interior image should be the absolute maximum. --timsdad ^(talk) 00:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that there are indeed excessive images, I would disagree that some of them are "unneeded" nor that you should set an arbitrary value to limit the number of images in this article. I removed the ones that are indeed unneeded, like the two floor images, which are basically showing the same thing. But other images show very distinctive parts of the building, so are unique and non-replaceable with a free alternative, which is the given rationale. Softjuice (talk) 14:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos needed[edit]

Aren't there Wikipedia fans? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.78.90.176 (talk) 02:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Is the building also known as Light Tower? I read this on skyscraperpage.com. Jerchel (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No its "Seoul Lite".

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, have a look at that here: [1] Jerchel (talk) 15:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this being built or cancelled?[edit]

The article is confusing about that. Infobox gives 2015 est. for opening, tense is usually will, but the section on cancellation suggests this project was dropped. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]