Talk:Separation of mechanism and policy

Computing: Software / CompSci Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

X11[edit]

A major example of this principle is X Window system, see: X_Window_System#Principles, last item. --Glasreiniger (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I first heard this "mantra" (zen koan?) in 1988, in the context of X10.4, shortly before X11 came out. Its not really correct to discuss this pattern, without discussing what actually happened with X11. See for example, http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PolicyAndMechanism for a brief overview. Note also that in the early 1990's the 3D wars raged, and PHIGS lost, and OpenGL won, and it was often said that the reason was that PHIGS provided too much policy, which made it impossible to implement on modern hardware in a performant way. OpenGL exposed the hardware (i.e. exposed the mechanism), whereas PHIGS was a collection of policies about what you could and could not do with the hardware, hiding the hardware and preventing you from doing what you wanted. (we're seeing this again, with the latest DirectX 12 vs opengl wars, except this time, opengl is kind-of-ish on the wrong side.) 67.198.37.16 (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]