Talk:Sequoia Capital/Archives/2012

Atari

Does the "Portfolio" section only refer to Sequoia's current portfolio? I'm positive that they invested in Atari back in the 70s, but it's not on the list. Fishyfred (talk) 17:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Bad selection of information - "Facts & Figures" missing, complete Portfolio is overkill

Wikipedia is my preferred source to get instant info about a company. It is many times too painful to find "Facts & Figures" (turnover, earnings, employees) on corporate sites - like on Sequoia's.

Why do we need a complete portfolio, a short selection with highlights like Apple or Atari would be enough (and interesting). The corporate website is a much better place for a complete actual and past portfolio. Do you agree with me deleting it?

--Peter Walt A. (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree. It is full of clutter. I removed the list, and referred users to company's official page.Cantaloupe2 (talk) 09:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Crunchbase is an unacceptable source

I'm going to be questioning contents that reference Crunchbase. It is just like Wikipedia. Anyone can edit it, so its not an acceptable source to use as a reference for creating an encyclopedia. From the site, it reads "CrunchBase is the free database of technology companies, people, and investors that anyone can edit."

Cantaloupe2 (talk) 09:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC)