Talk:Serious Sam 2/GA1

GA Reassessment[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Due to a lack of activity, the article has been delisted. Renominations at any time are welcome. -15:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
It's been a good 26 months or so since I reviewed this and passed it as a GA... however as part of WikiProject Good Articles project quality task force I am re-reviewing the article, and mapped to the current good article criteria this article is lacking in several respects. Outlined below:

Prose: choppy in places, but that's nothing a good copyediting pass wouldn't fix.
Coverage: More info for reception is needed and the reviews that exist could stand to be expanded. I will see if there are print magazine/newspaper refs that could be used to expand this.
Images: need better Fair use rationales per WP:NFCC. I removed the images that obviously wouldn't fly already.
References look fine in terms of reliability, but the citation templates should be entirely filled out.
The lead needs to be reworked; we don't need publication scores in the lead unless it's exceptionally notable, and it should summarize the entire article.
Gameplay could stand some additional referencing and maybe some trimming (there might be some original research and comparisons lurking in there that should be taken care of.

If you need any assistance with the above, I would be happy to lend whatever spare time I have to helping. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 02:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.