Talk:Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image[edit]

Good article, a nice start by CardiffCW. Can anyone think of an appropriate image to brighten it up? Probably one of the Severn Estuary? The only thing I can find at the moment is: -->

Fig (talk) 08:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

This article s about the tidal power project and a feasibility study is just a part of every project. Also the article itself says "As part of the project, the Government is carrying out a feasibility study", which means the feasibility study and project are not the same thing. Therefore, I will change the name to Severn Tidal Power.Beagel (talk) 06:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I strongly disagree and have undone your change. The article is about the study, that's what it was created for. The wider topic of power in the Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel is covered in Severn Barrage. If you want a general purpose article then by all means create one, but don't change the purpose of this article. --TimTay (talk) 07:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]