Talk:Shadowrun Chronicles: Boston Lockdown

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Wally Scharold (3 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (1 participant)
Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (9 participants)
Stick Soldiers (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

ZX Spectrum (nom)
The Sims Online (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
General Leo (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Missile Command 3D (nom)
Harold Halibut (start)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (start)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Home Safety Hotline (start)
Klefki (start)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Virtual Boy Wario Land (start)
Lucky Luna (start)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is it really an MMO?[edit]

I did not found anything (official) that say it's a MMO.

They only talk about smaller scale Shadowruns in an online environment. The only MMO talk i found was non official speculation.

Does anyone know more ablaut it? I don't want to edit anything, because it failed a Google search. 95.88.83.231 (talk) 04:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to edit. --Niemti (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for deletion[edit]

Considering lack of update since 2013 (with the exception of "Needs Expansion" notices) the entire article should be deleted as unnoteworthy. Nobody is going to expand on this. Be Bold! Cuvtixo (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a valid deletion rationale. You're free to nominate it for deletion at WP:AFD, but considering the Metacritic source already in the article shows it received significant coverage in the form of reviews from IGN, Gamespot, and Eurogamer, it's pretty likely to not be deleted due to meeting the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 19:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Additionally, I agree with Lightkeydarkblade that you recent removals of section headers were inappropriate. -- ferret (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've already responded to you on my talk page. Your previous edits on the page (including one that removed a sourced statement on the game serving shutting down on the basis of "anti-advertising") were effectively the opposite of helping the page to improve. Your proposal of deletion gives me the impression that you just want the page to be deleted without any valid reasoning. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 10:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned user draft[edit]

Please would an interested editor assess the unused independent draft at User:McDougle/sandbox, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 20:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]