Talk:Shag Times/GA1
GA Reassessment[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is undergoing a Good Article Reassessment as part of the Good Article sweeps. Looking through the article, I had a few concerns:
- There is no information about sales figures or chart performance (if any).
- There is no list of Personnel, which members of the Album project have informed me are essential for GA class.
- There seems to be a lot of assumed knowledge. I can follow the JAMs to KLF transition, but should I know who The Timelords and Disco 2000 are?
- According to the infobox, it seems to be released by KLF Communications. Could something about this apparently newly created label be included in the "Context" section?
- The "Reviews" section seems really short. Did only two reviewers comment on it?
- In the Q Magazine review, it says that the album helped reopen a debate about creative ownership, but this article doesn't mention anything about that.
- The non free-use rationale template should be used for the image of the album cover.
- Stating in the footnotes that Longmire's work is "the authoritative KLF discography on the internet" seems like point of view.
I will place this reassessment on hold for one week to allow for these concerns to be addressed. If this can be completed within seven days, I will continue with an examination of the prose. If not, the article will be delisted. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- No progress has been made, so I am delisting this article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)