Talk:Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Winners List[edit]

Does anyone have the 99-05 winners list? --Anshul 12:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

harish 2409:4052:210F:9606:68FF:8535:33E5:7F1A (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seperation[edit]

It is better to seperate the prize into its seven different fields and prepare the list for each. Otherwise the list is very long.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 07:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

hello 2409:4052:210F:9606:68FF:8535:33E5:7F1A (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not the most prestigious anymore[edit]

The award has been quite superseded by the India Science Award in terms of monetary value and recognition. Statement need to be rephrased. Chhandama (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given we do not have the complete list of laureates of India Science Award and its less signifiacant history it will be difficult to assign it as "the most prestigious" Though I am not sure of it. Solomon7968 (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, prudence may be safe, but the reason for the bold claim is that not only the prize money is more in ISA (in reality the maximum amount a recipient collect for Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar is actually Rs. 5 lakhs, as the award is split into many discipline, for a fresh news see this which shows the devaluation of the prize as each discipline can have more than one recipients), but also that it is directly selected by the central ministry, while Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar is selected by CSIR, which is supported by the ministry, therefore, the hierarchical superiority of ISA. Further, ISA is age-limitless and not given every year because of its stringent requirement of outstanding achievement, whereas Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar is strictly for below 45 years of age and given generously to ~10 individuals. I think I make my case.Chhandama (talk) 11:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maximum Shanti Swarup winners infact do not have wiki articles and it is difficult to write about them because of only 2 or 3 sources. So infact which award is more significant does not matters but we should try to improve coverage of Shanti Swarup winners. I noted only the Shanti Swarup winners in mathematics has relatively good coverage (I made 4 bio) but this is really low compared to the designation of highest award of a Country like India. Solomon7968 (talk) 11:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. Indian scientists are adorned with so many awards, honours, titles but not recognised internationally. Our local science is, I fear, entirely based on our vague credentials, not our outputs. By the away, the point I criticise is the statement that "(SSB Prize) is the highest award for science in India", which it certainly is not. Chhandama (talk) 11:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Want to share an interesting observation but since it is not associated directly with the page will talk to your talk page. Solomon7968 (talk) 11:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210163924/http://www.csir.res.in/External/Utilities/Frames/career/main_page.asp?a=topframe.htm&b=leftcon.htm&c=..%2F..%2F..%2FHeads%2Fcareer%2Fawards.htm to http://www.csir.res.in/External/Utilities/Frames/career/main_page.asp?a=topframe.htm&b=leftcon.htm&c=..%2F..%2F..%2FHeads%2Fcareer%2Fawards.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

corona wirus bhakti[edit]

harish meena c-49 new jawahar nagar city kota state rajasthan country india नया युग नही सोच 2409:4052:210F:9606:68FF:8535:33E5:7F1A (talk) 15:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]