Talk:Shark Attack 3
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. After two full listing periods, there is one oppose vote and one unanswered query, and only the nom in support. It has not been shown that reliable sources overwhelmingly use the subtitle, therefore per WP:SUBTITLES it is legitimate to omit it. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 11:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Shark Attack 3 → Shark Attack 3: Megalodon – Full title of the film. --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Old Naval Rooftops (talk) 09:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- But do reliable sources usually include the subtitle? If not, it's not necessary. WP:ON and WP:SUBTITLES apply. The subtitle could also be useful as WP:NATURAL disambiguation, but in this case, there's nothing to disambiguate against. --BDD (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - existing title is the WP:COMMONAME. The addition is unnecessary and is neither "natural" or "concise" as required per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA --Rushton2010 (talk) 02:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.