Talk:Shaun Attwood

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shaun Attwood article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation Start‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted on 11 November 2011 by reviewer Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arizona Low‑importance

	Arizona portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Tone[edit]

this article is written like a book review. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 03:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may have something: read the author's blurbs at Amazon.com and Amazon.co.UK; the resemblance to the content of the article is uncanny. --Naaman Brown (talk) 02:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's usually the person himself/herself who knows what's happened, or maybe a close relative. And that's how these texts come about in that way. If it's accurate, who cares who wrote it and with what intention? The Arizona police, or sheriff would be welcome to edit, I guess.

I only care about the truth, not how it gets here or if some government has declared it a secret. Veritas non olet. 58.174.193.2 (talk) 07:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

I have removed pictures except one to conform with the WP:Manual of style and to create a better looking article, specifically MOS:IMAGES. Relevant here is that the lead should contain one image best representative of the subject, and that pictures must be relevant and encyclopaedia, not decorative. And of course, not overloading articles with images is listed in the brief do's and don't at WP:IMGDD. Onetwothreeip (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article belong in the English Conspiracy Theorists category?[edit]

Does the fact he wrote "Clinton Bush and CIA Conspiracies: From The Boys on the Tracks to Jeffrey Epstein Gadfly Press (2019) " mean he is notably and verifiably a conspiracy theorist? The CIA have certainly been verifiably involved in conspiracies (that is their job!), reporting just those wouldn't make Attwood a conspiracy theorist, but reporting as fact that they faked the moon landings or killed Jeffrey Epstein may do so.

Not having read the book (not on my reading list) I don't know whether any of the claims in the book are conspiracy theories, if I read it and came to that conclusion by myself, I think that would class as original research. Has anyone read it and reported either way in a reliable source? Or reliably called Attwood a 'Conspiracy Theorist' widely enough for it to meet the criteria for categorisation?

I see him mentioned in vaguely this context here https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10595719/prince-andrew-virginia-roberts-apology/[[1]] (tabloid) https://sunderlandmagazine.com/celebrations-as-ghislaine-maxwell-arrested-will-she-see-justice-89350/[[2]] (tabloid) https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/2020/10/22/david-icke-the-groundwork-for-qanon/[[3]] HopeNotHate don't shy away from calling Icke a conspiracy theorist, but Attwood gets 'Youtuber'.

JeffUK (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't believe we should be violating our policies on original research, verifiability, and living people for an unsourced, WP:POINTY edit. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 19:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, my answer right now is No too, I don't think anyone's written anything of note about Attwood for some time. He's mostly notable for is criminal career and books on true crime. JeffUK (talk) 07:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attwood's Youtube Channel[edit]

Attwood had his Youtube Channel closed down against his will. It was eventually restored by Youtube after Attwood deleted all his many Jeffery Epstein / Ghislane Maxwell videos (which he often gloated over, boasting about them numbering in their 100's) they were retrospectively removed by Attwood - with no explanation. This Wikipedia entry seems written in a style of self promotion, much like many of his dubious Youtube channel interviews with convicted criminals, often glorifying crime, violence and drugs culture.