Talk:Shelburne, Vermont

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Vermont may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

notability[edit]

I removed these two newly added residents. Wikipedia has WP:BIO guidelines. If notability can be established, please feel free to re-add.

Mike Littlehale, Co-founder of Mutton Chop Productions
Hannan Merritt, Co-founder of Mutton Chop Productions

Jessamyn (talk) 20:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Shelburne, Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130126195441/http://www.shelburnemuseum.org:80/collections/detail.php?id=8 to http://www.shelburnemuseum.org/collections/detail.php?id=8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wealthiest Municipality Claim[edit]

The cited source for this claim notes only income levels. Wealth and income are not the same thing. Wealth is what you have after you subtract debt from resources, and has nothing to do with income. The claim should be removed. What do others think? 2601:18C:4303:4550:99A:FCD6:877E:1DD4 (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note: I realize the cited article from the Free Press uses the term wealth, however the actual facts cited in the article are income related only. No facts are cited regarding actual wealth of residents. 2601:18C:4303:4550:99A:FCD6:877E:1DD4 (talk) 18:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]