Talk:Shmerke Kaczerginski/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Catrìona (talk · contribs) 14:14, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. Some initial comments:

The header image permissions are pretty dodgy, with a Wikipedia user "unknown" claiming authorship of a photo taken almost a century ago. You may need to tag this fair use if there is no free pic of Kaczerginski.
Second wife missing from infobox
The article implies that the Vilna Ghetto uprising happened, but failed. In fact, it did not happen at all because the population of the ghetto did not support it.
"a good scholar and even better comrade", "animated, sometimes incendiary verses", "the martyrs’ last will and testament to future generations", "productive even by his own industrious standards" Please provide direct in-text attribution for all quotes
Provide English translations for all mentioned Yiddish works.
I would recommend having a Guild of Copy Editors volunteer look it over for copyediting, but if you'd prefer not to wait another two weeks I'll have a go myself.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

How is this review going, it seems to have stalled. AIRcorn (talk) 22:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aircorn: The nominator has not edited for several months. Unfortunately, I can't speak Yiddish and therefore cannot implement all of the fixes. Should I mark it as failed or wait longer for the nominator to return to the article? b uidhe 05:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Copper Dreamer: has edited twice recently so I guess we should give them a chance to respond. If they don't in a week or so I would just fail it. AIRcorn (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Buidhe: Probably time to close this. AIRcorn (talk) 22:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing[edit]

As Buidhe has not edited since February 9, and nominator Copper Dreamer has not edited the article once since the review was opened, I am closing this nomination and review as abandoned. Pinging Aircorn as a courtesy, since they were concerned about this review being stalled. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]