Talk:Shulaveri–Shomu culture

Azerbaijan Mid‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Georgia (country) Top‑importance

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caucasia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia articles

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I deleted the previous 15 years old comments which mainly consisted personal insults instead of arguments.HJJHolm (talk) 07:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion of geology with prehistory[edit]

These continuous confusions of prehistory and even history with the idiosyncratic geological "periods" are a pity. The confusion is in particular that you never know, what the different authors mean by the dates: Before 1950 AD (as for radiocarbon dates), in which case we now live in the year 65 after BP; before 2000 AD (b2k, as often used in the icecore chronologies), in which case we now live in the year 15 after b2k; or "ago", in which case all these senseless pseudo-scientific "dates" had to be changed every year! For what on earth do we have a common, well-known calendar, used in all textbooks of (pre(history), which naturally should be used here too, instead of these ambiguous times, which, btw., are only based upon the reforestation of Europe after the glaciation.HJJHolm (talk) 07:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also: The box "Holocene" is nonsense in a (pre)-historical article. Don't forget to add the box "On planet Earth" ...HJJHolm (talk) 07:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National templates should be removed[edit]

This is a neolithic cultures and any mention of nations is not correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matenagir (talk • contribs) 08:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exact!!! Seems to be too difficult to understand for some of the above writers with their limited brain.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:29DB:A0E9:6EEB:39E4 (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Nonsense deleted[edit]

The Culture was not "preceded by the Trialetian C.", which followed three millennia (!) LATER.HJJHolm (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Article![edit]

[1]https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.17.589600v1

[2]https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.17.589597v1 5.215.27.184 (talk) 10:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]