Talk:Siege of Golconda

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Asian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Neutral issues[edit]

The page mostly praises than the information it gives, and its more like a documentary full of praises to a particular thing or a person,and here we have to maintain a balanced article.The page had loads of spelling errors and errors like missing brackets,i tried to correct them and added a little bit more information and made it look more of official,if there are more mistakes or grammatical mistakes please help correct them. The article at many points does nothing but praise somebody,i removed some of the adjectives which were meant for nothing but to praise Mughals or their Qutubshahis.Yes i had to repeat a 'praising' thing again and again because its the only thing,along with some errors that ruin this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haider67 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]