Talk:Siege of Gurganj

Military history: Asian / Medieval / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Mongols: Mongol Empire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mongol Empire task force.

Siege of Gurjan incomplete description[edit]

Article says, "When the city was eventually taken, it was annihilated, in one of the bloodiest massacres in human history."

Because, what happened next? Article author apparently knows enough to make this claim, but doesn't say what he knows, just leaves reader to trust this as an accurate statement. Author should further describe what happened in the annihilation and massacre. Reader can then decide for self. Besides being of further intrinsic interest. 2605:5480:E:E0:C5AD:2112:22DC:D2D5 (talk) 13:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although the article is a stub and needs to be expanded, the statement is trustworthy because of the citation at the end of the sentence. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]