Talk:Siemens-Duewag Supertram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 December 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. See no opposition to this page rename as it was proposed. Happy Publishing! (closed by page mover)  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  01:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Siemens-Duewag SupertramSheffield Supertram rolling stock – A proposal to merge the content of this article with that of British Rail Class 399; based on the information existent I do not see the need to have separate articles for each type of rolling stock, at least not at this point. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 02:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Aervanath (talk) 21:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)--Relisting.  samee  talk 06:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both are notable, and it's usual for them to have separate articles. British Rail Class 399 is more notable than most light rail vehicles in the UK, as it is used on the first tram-train service. That article should probably be renamed to "Supertram Citylink" or something similar, because they are Supertram units; the class number is for operating on the national rail network. Peter James (talk) 13:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note I have left a notice on WT:WikiProject Trains, as those editors may be able to contribute.--Aervanath (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: members of WikiProject Yorkshire have been notified of this relisted debate.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  19:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not sure of how to cite this information[edit]

As per the latest edit, I added info from an official Siemens source that this guy uploaded, which I'm unsure of how to cite. Please help me by changing it up a bit. Edgar Searle (talk) 03:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]