Talk:Sigil Games Online

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (7 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (15 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

SOE Acquisition[edit]

John Smedley posted to the official forums announcing that SOE has acquired Sigil. On the one hand, that's unequiovically Smedley, but on the other a forum isn't much of a source for Wikipedia. Hopefully a useable news article or press release will follow. --Melissa Della 20:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well I have wikified the article and attempted to add in some info about today's acquisition news (I found a press release after making my first comment). I think this article still needs some expansion by someone who knows the company and its history better, though. --Melissa Della 21:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Is the "You're all fired" quote actually accurate? You can't quote something if it's not real. I suspect this would be rumour and not what actually happened. Yes things went horribly wrong for that company and that game, but I doubt someone lead them all outside and said those exact words. I'm sure they would have said, "Everyone is being let go" or something. If there is no proof of that exact quote, then the wording of the wiki page should be changed to reflect that, and it should just say they were lead to the parking lot and informed that they would be losing their jobs and some would stay, or whatever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.93.44 (talk) 02:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]