Talk:Silent Circle (software)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Cryptography: Computer science Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

"proprietary encryption technology"[edit]

This press release seems to indicate that the encryption used in Silent Circle isn't available for inspection. Is this confirmed in other media? Given that security through obscurity is not accepted as valid, it would be worth adding to the article. -effigies (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC concerning the Lavabit email service[edit]

There is a request for comments (RfC) that may be of interest. The RfC is at

Talk:Lavabit#RfC: Should information about Lavabit complying with previous search warrants be included?

At issue is whether we should delete or keep the following text in the Lavabit article:

Before the Snowden incident, Lavabit had complied with previous search warrants. For example, on June 10, 2013, a search warrant was executed against Lavabit user Joey006@lavabit.com for alleged possession of child pornography.

Your input on this question would be very much welcome. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Were (are) their data centres in the US or Switzerland?[edit]

The Kolab Now article claims they offer an email service that's reasonably safe because their servers are in Switzerland rather than US, and it gives LavaBit and Silent Circle as examples of email services that shut down because being in the US carries too many risks.

I see that Silent Circle's headquarters is now in Switzerland, after moving from Canada. Is the Kolab Now article wrong about Silent Circle's data centres being in the US (in 2013)? Were the data centres in the US or was it Canada? And are they now still there or are they now in Switzerland?

Whatever the answer, I'd like to clarify this in both articles. Anyone able to help? Gronky (talk) 19:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia, MD ??[edit]

I really wonder where this information comes from. I tried to establish the correct info from their website, in their blog I found information referring to Nevis, where they were founded, and Switzerland, where apparently they are now. I can only conclude Columbia, MD is wrong, so I corrected the headquarters location in the article. WikiPidi (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]