Talk:Siren (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Matt Alt (1 participant)
Granny (video game series) (2 participants)
Sago Sago (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (2 participants)
Unreleased third Minecraft album (5 participants)
Kelly Metzger (5 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (10 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (6 participants; relisted)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (7 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Voice acting rehash[edit]

I dont see the point in adding that the voice acting was bad due to the charactera being japanese and the voices being british. Its an extremely juvinile thing to write considering the array of translated games out there. I'm removing that senseless line, you americans rly need to calm down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.61.253 (talk) 09:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shibito are 屍人, not 死人[edit]

It's a small difference, but 死人 is already a word, "shinin", which is quite literally a corpse. 屍人, shibito, which as best as I can tell, is an original word, is more like "Corpse person". Check the kanji against the Japanese Section. I'll change it, unless someone takes issue with it. --Col.clawhammer 09:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shibito / Character Images[edit]

Would it be alright if we uploaded images of characters and shibito if they were poor quality, because I have no other way of getting the images without a digital camera. I just wanted to check before doing it. サイレン 16:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of questionable value[edit]

I just removed a block of text that was poorly written and kind of juvenile. I'll paste it here in talk, inside an HTML comment after this message. Edit this talk to see it. If you see value in the excerpt, rewrite it and repost it. Personally, I don't see any helpful information in this text. Oed 07:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's really More opinion than fact, although the game did recieve a critical mauling mainly due to the western voice acting and a few other features of the game engine. Could perhaps be neutrally re-written in a much more concise fashion under a 'critical reception' section. Also if anyone can explain why the text I inserted into 'Main characters' as regards Mina Onda was removed, please do. EDIT: In fact, a huge chunk of the games story and other edits (to characters and Shibito descriptions) I made were removed as well. While they weren't spectacularly well-written, they were far more factually correct than some of the stuff in the current version. I was actually intending to tidy them up. Daigo Kazama III

Cleanup[edit]

I've shortened most of the character bios and removed some of the irrelevant ones (For example: Do we need bios for Tomoko's parents who have about two lines in the whole game? No) Before anyone complains, there was way too much unsourced O.R. in the text anyway and the whole thing read like a fansite (And I should know - I wrote most of the original text of the article myself). It needed to be shorter and less speculative, and have bios for less redundant characters. Daigo 14:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red links removed on 06 january 2007 12:22

Issues needing solution per WP:VG/GL[edit]

General copy-edit and a citation clean-up.
Lead: addition of the key points of the plot, gameplay, development, and reception.
"Gameplay": removal of excessive details reading like a guide.
"Plot": removal of trivia and some OR/speculation.
"Development": major expansion.
"Reception": addition of more reviews and substitution of massive amount of direct speech with indirect speech (selective use of direct speech when absolutely needed). Hula Hup (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested sources[edit]

For "Development": [1], [2]. Hula Hup (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Siren (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120426142730/http://www.gamespot.com:80/siren/reviews/siren-review-6094610/ to http://www.gamespot.com/siren/reviews/siren-review-6094610

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit[edit]

I see this upcoming release listed, but it's supposed to be a HD remaster rather than an emulated PS2 release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:A643:D600:68B0:A887:A5DB:349C (talk) 03:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]