Talk:SmartAction

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled[edit]

Hi, thank you for your help. This is my first contribution to Wikipedia, so I need all the help I can get! I just started preparing this entry, and will do my best to get it up to Wikipedia's standards and guidelines as fast as possible. I'm researching this company and have a list of references that I will work into the Wikipedia entry. Give me a few hours then let me know if it still falls short. I realize I should probably have played in the sandbox first :-) R001605 (talk) 04:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this got tagged because it reads like an advertisement, or at least like a press release. in order for this article to look like a Wikipedia article, it needs reliable secondary sources. This means that people other than those who are directly invested in the project believe it is interesting. if you can find some secondary sources it will help the case quite a bit.Coffeepusher (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I have tried to make the article as neutral as possible, with third-party references for every significant claim. Please let me know how to improve its objectivity, neutrality, quality, and usefulness further. This was my first contribution to Wikipedia and a fascinating learning process. I look forward to editing other articles and contributing more articles in the future, so your help in guiding me while I learn is much appreciated.R001605 (talk) 10:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck on your first contribution and getting it up to standards. I wish you good luck with this and your future contributions as a wikipedia editor. Redge (talk) 23:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Coffeepusher and Redge for your thoughtful feedback. It's quite a learning curve! I had added more information about the technology to make the article more "encyclopedic", but then got told that all this information makes the article less encyclopedic! I'm now thinking that I'll remove most of the information and integrate it with the artificial general intelligence and interactive voice response articles. R001605 (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice the artificial general intelligence article already has a reference to Adaptive AI, Inc.—the R&D parent of SmartAction—but no article yet. So perhaps I should start an article for Adaptive AI, Inc. and shift the relevant information over to that article? R001605 (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Curious. Any influence from AI-TTE from the early '90s? — al-Shimoni (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]