Talk:Social Democratic Party of India

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 March 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

India: Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Invalid Reference[edit]

The reference no:2 is now invalid. I think that should be removed.--Rameshng (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rameshng, Thanks for pointing out. I had fixed the issue. But some user removed all my edits for no reason. I have no idea why the user:Debresser deleted the contents. -- Indiashines (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General cleanup of the entire article. April 2014.[edit]

I have tried to retain all content. Keep all citations and tag them appropriately. Remove unnecessary duplication. Added some content from existing source to balance the discussion where only selected parts of the text is reproduced to give incomplete picture. Will try to transform all online reference appropriately to save them from link rot. Jyoti (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, updated 9 bare urls into proper references. Also time stamped other tags and changed the layout consistently. --Jyoti (talk) 07:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this to reliable source board if needed, the statement is balanced.[edit]

Hi User:Huhshyeh, I think New Indian Express is a regular news paper. I am not aware, but if you can point me to a Wikipedia discussion where it has been discarded as unreliable source and discouraged from use it will be helpful. We cannot rely on an contributor's personal view. Besides I find it fairly balanced. Till then please do not discard this thisstatement claiming the source is not worthy. Jyoti (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

This edit is a copyvio from here. --AmritasyaPutra^T 12:15, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That editor is going on a rampage I guess! --AmritasyaPutra^T 12:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it certainly appears to be. They've been reverted for now, but let's keep an eye out. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Table for General election[edit]

The label extremeist is Unsourced. The election result is already covered in prose. Explain the need for table in the talk page Venkat TL (talk) 11:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained on my talk page, The WP:LABEL "Extremist" that I re-added after your edit was because of an edit conflict. I did not intend to add that back in the article. >>> Extorc.talk(); 12:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, please make sure to recheck after making edits if you get edit conflict. Venkat TL (talk) 12:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Thanks. >>> Extorc.talk(); 12:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]