Talk:Social architecture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Definition Socializing[edit]

I would like to add a second definition: "The structure of one's interactions with others, whether in person, on the phone, at events, by email, via various social media, etc."

Discussion:

"The world of business discovered social media in 2009. Business professionals are setting up professional Facebook pages, groups and fan pages for themselves and their companies in a way they never did with LinkedIn, MySpace or Plaxo. Those with public profiles are Twittering, and all are experimenting to understand how these highly engaging methods work and the role they will play in a well-structured personal/professional communication program alongside the more traditional video conferences, phone calls, letters, emails, meetings, dinners, events, etc.

Each is a superb game-changing tool that promises to enable the business professional to maintain many more quality relationships than was ever previously possible. Overuse can cause distress among those who receive excessive or wrong communications, while leaving little time for work, especially as more and more tools become available.

A balance must be struck and an architecture must be adopted that identifies which of these social methods to use when, with what audience, with what frequency, in combination with which other methods, using which interface, etc.

Those who master this Social Architecture will enjoy great efficiencies of effort and outdistance their competitors." Paul Bodine 2009 (unsigned)

I added a paragraph title with an assumed term -- 84.115.204.241 (talk) 13:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I'm not confident this term/theory is sufficiently notable. At the least, the sources are very weak (a blog post and slide deck). To pass as notable, I think it should have significant third party use (beyond its originators/proponents) as seen in reputable sources. -Reagle (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We've been using at least one theory of Social Architecture since 2007 to build the ZeroMQ open source community. It's a process now used by a number of other open source projects. Not sure how reputable this makes it. It is at least documented and tested over almost a decade, including several cases of competing forks that used different processes and failed. FWIW I think it is worth documenting our successful open source practice, and "Social Architecture" is a good hook to hang it from. Pieter Hintjens (talk) 07:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Social Engineering[edit]

Inhowfar does the termin Social Architecture not only cover interpersonal structuring in local or topically dedicated groups, but also correlates with Social Engineering, not in the sense of interpersonal manipulation tactic, but civilisation strategy? -- 84.115.204.241 (talk) 13:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]