Talk:Society of General Internal Medicine

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Virginia

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links[edit]

Per Wikipedia:External links and common sense, why should we link to the journal when there's already an encyclopedia page for it? And what is the Gim Connect link? Biosthmors (talk) 16:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion - The GIM connect appears to be a social media initiative of the SGIM. Per WP:EL, this link probably should be removed as it is prominently available on the main page of the official site. The Journal is already noted in the article body and is wikilinked, so it is not necessary, and again per WP:EL, it is a deep link off the official site so it should also be removed. -- Whpq (talk) 18:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The two links have been removed. --Julie252 (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Biosthmors (talk) 20:14, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]