Talk:Softwell Maker
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This article has flaged to fast deletion when there was under construction. This is an important article about a new type of developer software tool that comming up, this is one the first English articles about this kind of tool, which in short time will take a important place in software development process. An English article will allow people know about this technology.
- Admittedly this may be an important new technology, but this page reads like an advertising brocure for the product rather than an encyclopedic article. The images may well represent copyright violations, and the overall tone of the article is more of a tutorial for the product than a neutral POV description of the product. Independent, third party reviews of the product should be cited to bolster the neutrality of the article.WikiDan61 (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
The images is a copy left with is not necessary company authorization. About third party reviews I take a look for some articles in web, but I found just some news in forum discussions. The realiable source I found in printed magazine, so I put there. 201.45.45.133 (talk) 18:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)