Talk:Solvay process

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relationship to soda ash article[edit]

There is substantial duplication between material in this article and in the article on "soda ash." I would think that the quite good text on the uses of soda ash in the present article (on the Solvay process) should be merged into the soda ash article and removed from this one. Comments? Anyone game to do the merger?EAS 13:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overall Equation[edit]

I was just wondering if anyone could put in an overall equation of the process in the first section? Easy and quick job that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks heaps.

OK. I made an effort to clarify this section. Please indicate if this is better, or make a stab yourself!EAS 02:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Useful links[edit]

Discrepancy[edit]

Forgive me if this is just a stupid mistake of mine, but on the wiki page for Sodium Carbonate, under the Hou process is: "Hou's Process is the most common current process in the world to produce sodium carbonate.", which goes against the claim in the introduction of this page that 3/4ths of the world's supply is made via the Solvay process. I don't know enough to know which to correct, but it seems some editing is in order. Cruorem 21:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider Huo's process to be a variant of the Solvay process. Both use the lower solubility of sodium bicarbonate compared to that of sodium chloride to precipitate the bicarbonate. The remaining part of the cycle is varied according to what byproduct you want to get. In earlier times, ammonia was expensive, so there was a motive to recycle it. Today it is less expensive, so selling the ammonium chloride as fertilizer is an economically viable way to do it. BTW the sodium carbonate article is in dire need of references to verify the facts of both processes. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 21:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Solvay process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ammonia solvay process[edit]

Mu 111.88.33.13 (talk) 09:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overall heat & mass balance missing[edit]

Most articles and block diagrams of the process ignore the energy & waste streams. There is almost no mention of the exit routes, nor relative quantities of the wastes, including:

1. unreacted CaCO3

2. nitrogen passing through the lime kiln

3. excess oxygen that is not reacted with kiln fuel

4. CaCl2

5. excess CO2.

There is also scant mention of the energy inputs:

1. kiln fuel

2. kiln exhaust fan electrical power

3. fuel/heat into the bicarbonate-to-carbonate reaction

4. steam for the ammonia distiller.

This information is lacking in almost all internet references on this process, which is amazing given that the process is 100 years old.

I think the Wikipedia article would be much enhanced to give a good summary of the full heat and mass balance, and a reference to accurate and complete data. Some may argue the H&MB data is not relevant to a Wikipedia page. However this process is a source of GHG, and there is nowhere else to be able to obtain data to understand the scale of the issue, or improve it, if not already working inside the industry.

I don't have this data and can't find it, which is why I write my comment here.

Can anyone in the know please help improve the article? Thanks, Jerry Jerryjoynson (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]