This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The site claims that the etymology of this word is ”Unknown, various assumptions connect it to Dacian”. Dacian is presumed to have been a language of which not one word survived. It is pseudo-scientific to claim the connection to ”Dacian.” The claim is predicated on a highly dubious book cited as a reference which places the discussion in political territory. The Romanian-Hungarian controversy over etymologies should be referenced instead. IN this case, it is almost certain that the etymology is of Magyar or Hungarian origin, but it has been connected to spurious etymologies by the Romanians for political reasons even though Romanians have politically administered the entire region in which the river is based for over a century. Tionfiul (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
