Talk:Sound collage

A fact from Sound collage appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that musical montage (montage meaning "putting together") is a technique where musical compositions or sound objects are created from collage?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/April.

Wikipedia

Music/Music genres task force

Sound collage is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Etymology[edit]

I think the etymology is inaccurate. Montage is French, from monter ('to mount'). Where did the "together" bit come from? It may be implied, but it's not "literally" as the article says. Quincy 22:32, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

From montage. See Talk:Montage. Hyacinth 02:46, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Merge[edit]

I merged Musical montage into this article as both where stubs. Hyacinth (talk) 04:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Artists & examples[edit]

Given that collage is such a widespread technique capable of wide definition all artists and examples should be cited. Hyacinth (talk) 04:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional citations[edit]

Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks rather well referenced to me. I have deleted the stale banner and some challenged claims going back just as far, and tagged two or three specific remarks that still need sources.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 23:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]