Talk:South African Class U 2-6-2+2-6-2

This article is written in South African English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Throwing away useful links[edit]

@Andre Kritzinger: With all due respect, you were too thorough in the reversal(s) and you threw away useful links. You threw away the baby with the bathwater so to speak. Peter Horn User talk 22:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know. But the important ones (eg the coupler types) I'm getting to anyway in the process of revisiting all 357 SA loco articles. Like locomotive, etc., linking steam is overlinking. -- André Kritzinger (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]