Talk:South Dakota v. Dole

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Congress' vs. Congress's[edit]

The construction Congress's should be preferred over Congress'. When Googling the former, the first hit is the Washington Post, an authority if there ever was one on Congress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.140.214.254 (talk) 02:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds reasonable. bd2412 T 04:44, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

Some Citation Needed tags in the relevant sections are needed to clarify the banner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.213.86.164 (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funding Percentage[edit]

The article as-is cites the amount to be withheld as 5% of highway funding. However, a hidden comment in the page code references the 10% figure. The actual directive was to withhold 5% the first year of noncompliance, and then 10% per year thereafter. Any reason for the 10% figure to be hidden? Thoughts on including the full 5%/10% info in the article, or is that getting too far off topic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.143.40 (talk) 20:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great catch! Edit made. - Walkiped ^{(T | C)} 18:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty-Eighth Amendment?[edit]

The article cites the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, however it links to the Twenty-First Amendment. Is it possible that the references to the Twenty-Eight are actually meant to be references to the Twenty-First. As far as I know, there is no Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution presently. Uvula (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]