Talk:Space Run
Space Run has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 15, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Space Run/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 12:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll have this finished today. JAGUAR 12:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Initial comments[edit]
The lead needs to be expanded slightly to comply per WP:LEADLENGTH. It needs to mention more parts about plot, development (if there is any) and the reception it received from critics
The infobox image should have a caption, like "Official cover art""The player acts as pilot for a cargo ship" - how about The player assumes the role as a pilot of a cargo ship?I would recommend merging the second and third paragraphs into one, to improve prose flow- "Reputation, displayed as stars, is rewarded based whether or not" - are rewarded
"Accompanied by the android, Adaam-12" - link Android (robot)"located in Lyon, France." - link Lyon"Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average score out of 100 to reviews from critics" - how about It received an aggregate score of 73 from Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average score out of 100 to reviews from critics"PC Gamer scored the game 69 out of 100" - needs italicisation"The best part of the game in their view was the time bonus, which is necessary to earn full reputation" - tad informal, try The reviewer considered the best part of the game as the time bonus, which is deemed necessary to earn full reputationThe legacy section is too short, try merging it with a sub-section under reception?
Not a bad article considering the lack of coverage, which I totally understand as I used to write a load of obscure 80s games! I done a search for any other reviews and PC Gamer and GameSpot were the only ones considered reliable, so I suppose that can't be helped. Once all of the above are addressed then I'll take another look at this. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll leave this on hold. JAGUAR 18:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)