Talk:Space Shuttle Independence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of the fleet[edit]

Q: Can't people consider Explorer to be among the shuttle fleet instead of a fake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talkcontribs) —Preceding undated comment added 19:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explorer was intended from the outset to serve as a reproduction of a shuttle for visitors to see, and did/does not serve the Space Shuttle Program in any way, shape, or form. By contrast, Enterprise was originally built in order to do atmospheric testing, and was intended to be refitted for actual spaceflight (though the latter never occurred). Then Pathfinder was originally built as a static test article, and was later done up to visually resemble a shuttle. So no, Explorer is not a "real" space shuttle any more than my station wagon is a "real" space shuttle. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Q: What year was Explorer built? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talkcontribs) 21:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Shuttle Explorer article should be labled as a stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talkcontribs) 20:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name change[edit]

I removed the section on a possible name change as it was speculation, the references were simple news articles that didn't mention the shuttle by name. They made no reference to a name change. And one actually did refer to the space shuttle as "Explorer". If you want to add this section back in provide more that speculation based on pictures and news reports. An official announcement by NASA or the current owner would be the only thing I consider acceptable. Lotu (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Space Shuttle Independence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]