This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
What is the provenance of this image? I can't find it on NASA's website like the image description claims, and it looks to me like a user-created image that was not designed properly. I've added an actual image from NASA in its place. Please also explain the use of this image in the article. Viriditas (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This image is two images from http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/main/ stacked one above the other. That is what the stated provenance is. I don't understand how the relevance can be misunderstood; as the preamble to the article states: [Space archaeology] includes launch complexes on earth, orbital debris, satellites,and objects and structures on other celestial bodies such as Mars. I also fail to grasp how your "actual image" is an improvement over my two also actual images. In fact yours is one of my two. Brews ohare (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Where is that image is on the page? You created the image. But you didn't do it correctly, and the image resolution is badly distorted. If you can't see this, then there might be something wrong with your display; You also added the wrong categories to Commons. I've nominated it for deletion, but you are free to create a new one (or ask for help). Can you answer the question about why it is being used in this article? I mean, there are hundreds of good images, why this one? If you cannot "grasp" how the current image is an improvement over the one you added, then we have a problem with your display. Which browser(s) are you using to view it and what is your screen resolution? Perhaps you don't understand that when you create a montage of two images, you have to use the original size or smaller to get it to display correctly. It looks like you enlarged the image from the original, or you somehow lost quality by saving it multiple times, or all of the above. If you need help with creating images, let me or others know. The image I added is not, I repeat, not one of yours because it displays correctly. Viriditas (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It looks OK to me in Firefox and in Explorer. It was saved as JPEG and has low resolution to save space. Brews ohare (talk) 14:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
JPEG's aren't upoaded as "low resolution to save space" on Wikipedia, hence you've nailed the problem. Viriditas (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the issue is resolved with your most recent upload. Thanks for fixing the image. Viriditas (talk) 07:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Space archaeology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
==Wiki Education assignment: FYSEM-UA 900 Busting 11 myths about the archaeology of human evolution== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Xiaoer8848.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Xiaoer8848.