Talk:Spectrum Brands

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rayovac Current Status (2020)[edit]

Spectrum Brands website doesn't appear to have any reference to Rayovac. Many current buyers of Rayovac brand batteries on Amazon complain about leakage. I wonder if these are counterfeit batteries and whether Spectrum is still making/selling Rayovac batteries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:140:8A00:AA70:F06B:CBFA:D7AD:5242 (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

===The lede says that the battery business was sold in 2018. If true, the History and Batteries sections need to be revised.

The battery business was sold to Energizer in 2018, the Batteries section should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:1343:8867:2844:7482:631F:D852 (talk) 15:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion - Rayovac[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Consensus is to merge. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rayovac should be merged into this article. Both of them are relatively short and there is no good reason for there to be two separate articles. – ukexpat (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There was some talk earlier this year about Spectrum Brands selling off Rayovac, but that seems to have subsided so an article merger at this point would be appropriate. Alanraywiki (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rayovac is a unique brand with unique products/consumers and should have its own page. Otherwise you should merge duracell into procter and gambel and energizer into S.C. Johnson(69.128.4.10 (talk) 21:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Energizer is not an S.C. Johnson product, it is a product of Energizer Holdings. Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the short article here, I agree that a merge would be productive. Rayovac batteries are their centerpiece brand, even now, and the separate article isn't likely to grow much beyond what's currently there. — Gavia immer (talk) 02:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. Rayovac and Spectrum are the same company. Spectrum Brands was originally Rayovac Corporation. Rayovac Corporation changed their name to Spectrum Brands in the mid 2000s because they had bought other companies, and thus had diversified their product line beyond batteries and flashlights. The Spectrum Brands article thus also needs some good cleanup too. [|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 02:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why merge? "Defunct" companies or company subdivisions, etc. can have their own articles. There's no need to merge. - M0rphzone (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rayovac article is about the brand, but also contains the history of Spectrum Brands, called Rayovac at the time; it's that section that perhaps belongs here. Peter James (talk) 19:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Production and development[edit]

It would be interesting to know something about production. Are Rayovac batteries still designed and built in facilities owned by Spectrum Brands and in the US, or do they only do marketing and quality studies, as the company name suggests?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spectrum Brands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130603064340/http://www.rayovac.com:80/Consumer-Services/History.aspx to http://www.rayovac.com/Consumer-Services/History.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rayovac link[edit]

Despite the merge decision there is still a wikilink to an ostensible Rayovac article in the last paragraphy of 1.1: "Rayovac, as a division of Spectrum Brands, remained headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin". Mcljlm (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Ray-O-Vac Twins[edit]

I looked up this article to see what "Ray-O-Vac" was after discovering a novelty 78 rpm record made in 1926 by "The Ray-O-Vac Twins", also known as Russ Wildey and Bill Sheehan (so presumably they weren't really twins). I don't know how famous they were at the time or how successful and long-lasting this slightly odd publicity campaign was, but does it perhaps merit a mention? If you're interested, here's the record:

https://archive.org/details/78_a-trip-to-the-circus_the-ray-o-vac-twins-russ-wildey-bill-sheehan_gbia0104772a 86.132.249.185 (talk) 10:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]