Talk:Speech processing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Speech processing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal[edit]

To me, it looks like Speech signal processing and Speech processing are articles on exactly the same topic, and I think they should be merged. (However, bear in mind that I'm not an expert in this area.) Would anyone object to me performing a merge? Best — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 05:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. This redundant stub has hung around too long. Dicklyon (talk) 06:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like Mr. Stradivarius I am not particularly expert in computational linguistics or information theory, but IEEE seems to regard these as the same or closely related topics. Merge 'em, I say. Cnilep (talk) 07:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, merging is good. Since Wikipedia is about things/concepts, not words, having two articles is a form of content forkery. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]} 12:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've performed the merge. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 04:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]