Talk:Spruce Lake Protected Area

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in British Columbia may be able to help!

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Proposals to move an article should be based on the article naming policy. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spruce Lake Protected Area → South Chilcotin Mountains Provincial Park – This area's name and status keep changing for various political reasons, currently it has been changed back from Spruce Lake Protected Area to South Chilcotin Mountains Provincial Park; "South Chilcotin" is actually a misnomer and the proper term is not "Chilcotin Mountains" but "Chilcotin Ranges", however BC Park's current name and governing legislation use the name format as give in their ref and in the proposed name change. Skookum1 (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Please read the various notices referring you to the article naming policy and I also recommend WP:official names for an explanation of the policy. Andrewa (talk) 15:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

I considered whether this should be relisted, but there seems a high likelihood that the eventual name will be neither the current name nor the proposed new name above, so a fresh RM based on the article naming policy and guidelines seems a neater way to go. Andrewa (talk) 15:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.