Talk:Sputnik virophage
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I just added a link to an article in Nature's news section which reports the discovery of two new virophages. These may warrant their own articles after more details become available. 76.199.13.86 (talk) 03:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Which is APMV[edit]
This article says "Mamavirus is formally known as Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (APMV) and is a close relative of the previously known mimivirus. " but mimivirus says it is APMV. - Rod57 (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- I also think the difference between mimivirus (APMV) and mamavirus should be clarified.--Miguelferig (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Redirection from Virophage[edit]
It must be created a different article called "Virophages" due to the fact that Sputnik is not the only virophage. So redirection in that wiki must be eliminated and the proper article must be created. In my opinion. --Torrenkte (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes ! And the word "satellite" is not appropriate. No virus should have been called Sputnik, these are parasites. 109.21.123.70 (talk) 20:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)