Talk:St. Helena Island Light

Lighthouses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wobser article in the Bibliography[edit]

This would seem to be a really good source on the restoration efforts, which should probably be given more detail in the article. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 03:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC) STan[reply]

Added a little. Bigturtle (talk) 20:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Historic Place[edit]

The banner at the bottom of the article is for the wrong light. Needs to be corrected. 11:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Stan

Details of the building, equipment, etc.[edit]

I don't have time to do this right now, but a description of the tower, the lenses and order of Fresnel lens -- original and any replacement, and that kind of data (See Terry Pepper and the Inventory links) would be standard fare for this kind of article, and I think of interest to some of our esteemed readers. If anybody has the time and inclination, this article can be improved substantially. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Stub class (Not)[edit]

This article is fairly long, comprehensive and documented. I think we deserve START at least. Please have somebody take a look. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 22:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Conflict on current lens[edit]

Terry Pepper implies that the light has a 300 mm acrylic lens. Other sources (the National Park Service Inventory and the Michigan Lighthouse Conservancy) say 250 mm. Maybe not critical, but it would be nice to get this right. Volume 7 of the Coast Guard List of lights doesn't list St. Helena Island at all. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 21:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Traditionally in cases of data conflict like this, the owner's inventory trumps; if there is no public owner's inventory (as may be the case here with the USCG) then the inventory provided by the institution closest to the owner is the trump. In this case that would appear to be the USNPS inventory. Bigturtle (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BT:

Thanks for your thoughtful response. I agree.

I personally wrote to Terry Pepper, as he is one of the foremost authorities (Terry Pepper, Seeing the Light), and is also the Executive Director of the Great Lakes Light Keepers Association. As you know, the Wobser's article in Boatnerd.com extensively documents the activities of the GLLKA in the St. Helen Island Light project.

Terry Pepper's response follows:

Not only are we at GLLKA involved at St. Helena - we have OWNED the station since 1996 (As it states on my website - "when in 1996, Representative Bart Stupak stepped in and sponsored a Bill through which the station buildings and reservation were transferred to the GLLKA as part of the Coast Guard Authorization Bill." As far as the currently installed optic, I can confirm that it is a 300mm Tidelands Signal optic. I have had my nose inches from the manufacturer's plate on numerous occasions when working in the lantern.

Kind regards, Terry

So I am going to change the listing to the Tidelands 300 mm signal optic.

Best to you. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 01:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

300 mm it is, then. Thanks for tracking this down. Bigturtle (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. I just want these articles to be accurate. If we can't say it for sure, we shouldn't say it.7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Image[edit]

Moved

St. Helena Island stands out from an icy background in the northwest quadrant of this wintertime aerial photograph.

to NHRP infobox. Needs to be sized? 7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Photo[edit]

As a part of Troop 4, I am going there next week as part of an annual restoration trip. I could take some up-to-date photos of the lighthouse while I am there. Carnivorousfungi (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. The article could use a gallery. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:34, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your offer, the lighthouse's surroundings are also of interest - the island has a relatively high-quality wetland shoreline on its northeastern side, facing the mainland. Bigturtle (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St. Helena Island Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.terrypepper.com/lights/lists/towers.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.terrypepper.com/lights/lists/focalheight.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.lighthousefriends.com/macstraits.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202040614/http://www.smartcommunities.ncat.org/success/saint_helena_island.shtml to http://www.smartcommunities.ncat.org/success/saint_helena_island.shtml
Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.dataleap.com/secure/pin/orderpage.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.lighthousefriends.com/macstraits.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on St. Helena Island Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512010320/http://landtrust.org/index.htm to http://www.landtrust.org/index.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517103804/http://www.sheplerswww.com/ to http://www.sheplerswww.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]