Talk:St Lythans burial chamber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The use of 'BP' is historian snobbery[edit]

I made one edit, but do not have the patience to change them all (nor do I think such a large change without discussion would be in the spirit of Wikipedia). There's not even a page explaining 'BP' in Wikipedia that I could find (Is it this 'Before Present' thing... and didn't that meaning recently change with the turn of the latest millennium?) Anyhow, this use of 'BP' is historian/archeologist snobbery. 'BCE' is FAR more common and I'm pretty sure that Wikipedia is a common encyclopedia, that is not specifically for historians and archeologists. 67.127.59.247 (talk) 16:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing it to the talk page. It would have been better had you done so before making changes, though. WP:Mos (dates and numbers) advises that 'consistency should be maintained within an article, unless there is a good reason to do otherwise'. I have, therefore, reverted your edit. (By the way, the edit was made as 5000 BCE, which would make it over 7000 years ago. whereas, the dolmen has been dated to 6000 BP (before present), which is 4000 BCE.) BP was used on this article because it deals with things that have been dated using radiocarbon dating and BP is commonly used in this area. I was not aware of any any historian/archeologist snobbery on the use of BP, as I am neither an historian nor an archeologist. I chose to use BP for 3 reasons: 1. It was appropriate for the subject matter; 2. I am not Christian and so prefer not to reference a god I have no connection to; 3. It tells you how long ago it was, instantly. I agree that Wikipedia is a common encyclopedia, and that is not specifically for historians and archeologists, but it is a medium to educate. I note that you were unsure of the term and have wikilinked it on its first use to avoid confusion in future. Daicaregos (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on St Lythans burial chamber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]