Talk:St Paul's Tower

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal St Paul's Tower is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sheffield Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biased edit?[edit]

This St Pauls Tower article contains comments that I would regard as opinion and bordering on a sales pitch. Much of the text sounds as though it has been lifted from a press release or similar. The link to the sales brochure reinforces this impression. It needs to be written in a more neutral manner. stan matthews 15:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to rewrite it! L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 01:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent report of administration section also contained speculative comments at the end of section (POV) ?, so have removed as other places for speculation. Administration is FACT so added news reports as references as ref section was missing any way. -BulldozerD11 (talk) 11:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St Pauls Tower or St Paul's Tower?[edit]

The apostrophed version seem to predominate in the article but is missing from the article name. Which is right? S a g a C i t y (talk) 07:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]