Talk:Stanley McCandless

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with McCandless Method[edit]

It seems like inserting the article on his method would be reasonable. DJSparky (talk) 04:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I commented there as well, I agree. The "method" article is a stub and would fit well here, with that article becoming a redirect. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 21:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see no problem, especially if the redirect pointed to the section on the method. -JWGreen (talk) 23:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prcisely! Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 02:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've done the merge. The old page points to the MM section here. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 04:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stanley McCandless. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]